Complete
Log In/ Sign Up

Misinterpretation of Results in Scientific Publishing

Have you encountered result misinterpretation in your field?

Login/Register View Results
This SciPoll seeks to understand the challenges and consequences of result misinterpretation in scientific literature.

In an era of rapidly advancing research and increasing publication volume, ensuring the accurate interpretation of scientific findings has become more critical than ever. Misinterpretation can occur at various stages - from data analysis to peer review to public dissemination - potentially leading to flawed follow-up studies, misguided policies, or public misconceptions. By sharing your experiences and insights, you'll contribute to a deeper understanding of this issue and help identify potential solutions to enhance the reliability and impact of published research.
General

SciPoll 647 Feed

  • Result 6493 user-532952

    08/01/2024 03:14

    Deliberate falsification of scientific results has been around for Centuries - modern scientists are perhaps less critical and there are far more scientists. Using AI  is just another excuse. Its only an advanced technique not "cheating". Its happened before : we speeded up data management and interpretation when we brought in calculators and then Computers in the 1960's. So there is a LOT more "big number" research out there. Any fool or cheat can take shortcuts and get the wrong answers in science. Its NOT due to AI. Its due to an incompetent researcher taking short-cuts and not understanding or using  shortcuts, instead  of the correct scientific method.  When calculators were invented schoolteachers and researchers banned them!   Then the universities  banned scientists from using computers because they would "write the research results". Post-grads had to use type-writers!!. Now it's the turn of AI.... LOL. I think being a scientist who published my first article in 1972 gives me a good over-view of the whole conundrum!!!