SciPoll 396: SOT/EUROTOX Debate: Is There a Role for Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) in Risk Decisions?
What is your level of experience with conducting or interpreting results from AI- and ML-based toxicity prediction models?
Results
(129 Answers)
Answer Explanations
- Limiteduser-711942
I’ve had more recent experience in the last 3 years
- Limiteduser-918734
Do some consulting in the field. Work on algorithms in the social sciences.
- Extensiveuser-446741
SAB and BoD member for computational chemistry/toxicology company.
- Limiteduser-320876
I have written an article (in press) on cancer artificial intelligent, where detailed future priorities were suggested to be focused on integration and analyses of a large body of isolated available data to identify numerous knowledge gaps on electrobiology of immune neuroplasticity in health or disease processes before giving isolated and disconnected data to AI which could complicate accurate risk assessment formulations.
- Noneuser-483397
Non-existant at time of retirement 9 yrs ago.
- Limiteduser-542826
Experience based on reliability of ADS
- Moderateuser-43697
Working with all available QSAR models (DEREK, Sarah, OECD models, previously Topkat etc)
- Limiteduser-441980
I am really willing to learn more in AI & ML.
- Extensiveuser-678105
I have used numerous AI and ML programs and now consider them a waste of time.
- Moderateuser-598239
graph theory, nodal analysis, #D reconstruction, etc.
- Moderateuser-74194
I used these techniques myself, have read extensively in this area and have reviewed the work of others.
- Moderateuser-718379
Been doing qsar for 20 years
- Limiteduser-125195
My experience was in managing programs to develop and apply such approaches with the goal to inform regulatory and other decisions and not to actually conduct and evaluate such studies
- Limiteduser-528003
use of (Q)SAR for predicting mutagenicity of compounds
- Moderateuser-77300
Moderate
- Moderateuser-532952
I have as a professor been involved with HACCP and risk assessment since I returned to academia in about 1990, when computers and AI were just starting. So I still review a lot of research in One Health and Food Safety, that are aligned to risk and hazard analysis. My feeling is , when reading publications, that some authors are relying on machine generated answers , rather than logical reasoning, to estimate risks. This results in over or under estimation of risks. For instance SARS-1 was overestimated and SARS-3 underestimated in the literature.
- Extensiveuser-377267
In my provison as chair of the CONTAM Panel of EFSA (Parma, Italy), I frequently use AI and ML in risk assessment.
- Moderateuser-995929
Mostly for prediction.
- Noneuser-480186
Only reading about.