4
SciPoll 684: Impact of Misleading Abstracts
In your opinion, who bears the primary responsibility for ensuring the accuracy of abstracts?
Results
(69 Answers)
Answer Explanations
- Authorsuser-753537Primary: authors!
secondary: reviewers and editors - Authorsuser-74194Peer reviewers have much less skin in the game than do the authors. Peer reviewers work for free and often read just enough of the paper to be able to offer their opinion.
- Journal editorsuser-772274The editors are the ultimate filter before a manuscript is published. they should be held accountable for inaccuracies found in abstract.
- Authorsuser-548373Authors are the ones with most information about the paper and they should be the ones that can synthesize knowledge presented in their work in the most concise and clear way possible.
- Peer reviewersuser-683654The peer reviewers do the approval before the paper is published and they must review the abstract.
- Authorsuser-504085I was not misled only by the Abstract, but poor description of the method.
- Authorsuser-205824The authors are the ones who write the abstract, so they have the most direct control over the content. It’s their responsibility to ensure that the abstract accurately summarizes the key findings, methodology, and limitations of the study. They must avoid overstating conclusions, cherry-picking results, or omitting important limitations. The abstract should provide a true reflection of the study.
- Other (Please explain)user-836452Only the authors really know.
- Authorsuser-66641Authors are responsible for the data
- Peer reviewersuser-909355I would say Authors first, but they are the ones choosing what to put in the abstract, so I would say those who have to ensure that the abstract is accurate are the reviewers, as they have access to all information, they could decide whether the content of the abstract ois accurate.
- Authorsuser-890212Peer Reviewers too are also expected to spot misleading abstracts.
- Authorsuser-69401Yes
- Authorsuser-36174As scientist the authore should respect the scientific world and reader. the have to aware that their work is going to be read by alot people