1
SciPoll 724: Alcohol and cancer - are warnings helpful?
In your opinion, does alcohol consumption pose as large a risk of cancer as the Surgeon General's report indicates?
Results
(108 Answers)
Answer Explanations
- Nouser-675225Poorly worded question. It's not a large risk unless the consumption level is also large and chronic. EVERYTHING has a safe, or virtually safe, dose--yes, even carcinogens (don't let the use of LNT mislead).
- Unsureuser-287804I don't think alcohol has a large effect on cancer. I don't think it's necessary to add warning labels on alcohol containers.
- Yesuser-763749Expert insights are essential to guide the next steps. Public health campaigns must balance delivering clear, evidence-based messages with sensitivity to cultural contexts. Research is also needed to evaluate the effectiveness of health warnings and policy interventions in reducing alcohol consumption and related cancer risks.
- Yesuser-84005Alcohol is a major risk factor for many types of malignancies, especially cancers of GIT, RT and breast. Many scientific researches with large cohor samples, including large populations studies and systematic reviews and meta-analyses, which show a clear link between how much alcohol a person drinks and their risk of getting cancer. Even drinking a small or moderate amounts can increase the risk, especially for breast and esophageal cancers.
- Yesuser-809621I am working in this area of research. Long term alcohol consumption leads to ferroptosis induced hepatic cancer.
- Yesuser-412689IT´s relationated with orofacial neoplasms
- Yesuser-381005Due to the risk of becoming addicted to alcohol and the concomitant high consumption there is a clear connection to cancer.
- Yesuser-188079Assoc w/ esoph and liver ca
- Yesuser-308918It is a preventable risk factor of head and neck cancer, esophageal cancer, pancreatic cancer, and liver cancer.
- Yesuser-318766Approximately 75,000 new cancer cases annually in the U.S. are attributed to alcohol.
- Unsureuser-904601It is unclear what other confounding factors have been studied. In my opinion studies where data are aggregated and disaggregated to determine additional influencing factors are needed. The risk also seems to vary significantly depending on culture or country of origin. Also in terms of type of alcohol used, and how it is used. For this reason I'm unsure. I would need to see more studies appraising methodological quality of studies that have demonstrated significant findings.
- Yesuser-433580Alcohol is definitely carcinogenic
- Yesuser-753537Definitely yes! This is not new, WCRF also includes this as "strong evidence" in their guidelines for cancer prevention.
- Yesuser-934201The data has become more clear in recent years, particularly for certain cancers (such as breast cancer). It should not be news that is has a direct effect on liver cancer.
- Yesuser-553940Because alcohol consumption regularly can damage your DNA by increasing SCE aberations making a way for spontaneous mutation in some of the oncogenes.
- Yesuser-629527The Surgeon General's report points out that alcohol can increase the risk of certain cancers, and that’s backed by a lot of research.
Drinking alcohol, especially in large amounts or regularly, raises the risk for cancers like those of the mouth, liver, breast, and colon. Even drinking in moderation can still be risky, particularly for some types of cancer.
So while alcohol isn’t the only factor, it definitely plays a significant role in increasing cancer risk. - Yesuser-857524In certain tumor types (head and neck for instance) there is direct evidence
- Yesuser-200555Alcohol has many drawbacks on hepatic performance which may have indirect effect on in carcinogenesis by either meta plasma or detoxification function of the liver
- Nouser-777970What is the statistics of women developing breast cancer versus those that consume alcohol
- Yesuser-800651The Surgeon General's report is backed by robust evidence linking alcohol consumption to various cancers, including liver, breast, and colorectal cancers. Given the significant number of cases and deaths, the risk warrants heightened public awareness and policy intervention.
- Yesuser-979199I think the true risk of alcohol in the subsequent development of cancer is probably underestimated. The risk would depend on numerous factors such as the type of alcohol and the type of cancer associated and the amount alcohol consumption.
- Yesuser-981678Excess of anything is injurious to health.
- Yesuser-262162Cirrhosis of liver
- Yesuser-102119There is a clear linkage between alcohol consumption and cancer risk. Among others, alcohol is capable of disrupting cell cycles, increase chronic inflammation, and damage DNA
- Nouser-730223We ingest man y more dangerous chemicals through food and drink that we consume, and even the air that we breathe. Alcohol does have some beneficial effect, if taken in moderation.
- Yesuser-565949There is good evidence to support this claim.
- Yesuser-563888Consumption of alcohol is increasing in all countries even amongst the pregnant women. Overall effect of this practice on cancer has to be broadcast in all countries.
- Unsureuser-78454In moderation, no. In excess, yes.
- Yesuser-282673It increases the oxidative stress.
- Yesuser-980513There are several studies that prove the link between alcohol and cancer.
- Unsureuser-138399Unfortunately, several factors impact the risk for cancer. Genetic pre-disposition, lifestyle, drinking habits, diet and exercise. Not that drinking is good but there are many daily life risk factors for cancer, and it would be interesting if data can be stratified based on criteria listed earlier.
- Yesuser-958242E
- Yesuser-208334Large studies over several years now help quantify the risk. Dose/response is shown and the data are of high quality. The prevalence of alcohol intake is so high that intervention will likely make a difference in cancer rates.
- Yesuser-499948The mechanisms of action are all very valid, and the report issued by HHS has good statistical analysis.
- Yesuser-794571The Surgeon General's report highlights the link between alcohol consumption and various types of cancer, including breast, liver, and esophageal cancer. Research has shown that even moderate alcohol intake can increase the risk of cancer due to the production of acetaldehyde, a toxic byproduct of alcohol metabolism that can damage DNA. Additionally, alcohol can impair the body's ability to absorb essential nutrients, weaken the immune system, and disrupt hormone levels, further contributing to cancer risk. Given this evidence, it is reasonable to conclude that alcohol consumption does pose a significant risk of cancer, as indicated by the Surgeon General's report.
- Yesuser-327641Alcohol increase inflammation almost immediately, likely to also increase risk of cancer.
- Nouser-120105When studies are based on surveys (rather than from direct observation, or other measurement) most people tell white lies, e.g., How many servings of vegetables do you eat in the average week? How many fast food meals do you eat in a week? How much exercise do you do per week? etc. They give an answer closer to what they believe the questioner wants to hear. Therefore, I believe all meta studies which include testimonial/survey type data are heavily flawed. However, if you do well controlled animal studies, using an omnivorous short lived animal you'll get true data for the species in question (and you can infer similar effects in other omnivorous animals, e.g., pigs, humans, primates etc., which would be far more expensive to conduct. Having said that, look at this sample of animal data.https://sciencesources.eurekalert.org/news-releases/802841
Here you'll find the experimental data indicates a longer life span is achieved in the groups consuming moderate amounts of alcohol. This could of course be the result of hormesis
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hormesis
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/nietzsches-toxicology/
Hormesis is a very real effect that I have personally observed on the growth rate of murine fibroblasts when exposed to very low levels of DNA damaging agents (which one would casually presume would block cellular growth; as they are designed to do). If only short term acute damage was studied in muscles given a single moderately intense weight training session in the untrained athlete, one would conclude that such training was very bad for muscles, however nothing could be further from the truth. Thus I am extremely skeptical of the Surgeon General's report. - Yesuser-110809Surgeon General has done a much more thorough examination of all the scientific literature than I could do (if I wanted to).
- Yesuser-711957There are clear evidences that made international organitions classify alcohol as carcinogenic.
- Nouser-489806No. Need more studies.
- Yesuser-904621Clinical studies suggest that alcohol consuming increase the incidence of different cancers. Eg liver, breast, esophagus
user-94795
02/04/2025 12:24user-956268
02/11/2025 10:10