5
What are the reasons you accept an invitation to peer review a manuscript?
Results
Never | Rarely | Sometimes | Frequently | Total | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
To contribute to the scientific community | 0.52% 2 | 2.34% 9 | 11.69% 45 | 85.45% 329 | 385 |
Because I want to learn/stay current in my field | 0.52% 2 | 4.99% 19 | 29.40% 112 | 65.09% 248 | 381 |
Topic is relevant to my expertise | 0.00% 0 | 2.34% 9 | 18.18% 70 | 79.48% 306 | 385 |
I personally know the editor asking me to review | 42.02% 158 | 31.38% 118 | 19.95% 75 | 6.65% 25 | 376 |
Because I personally know or know of the authors of the paper | 68.18% 255 | 22.99% 86 | 6.42% 24 | 2.41% 9 | 374 |
Other (please explain) | 74.17% 89 | 9.17% 11 | 9.17% 11 | 7.50% 9 | 120 |
Experts overwhelmingly accept peer review invitations to contribute to the scientific community, with the vast majority indicating they do this "Frequently." Similarly, most experts frequently accept reviews when the topic is relevant to their expertise, making this one of the strongest motivating factors.
Staying current in their field is another major motivation, with most experts selecting "Frequently" or "Sometimes" for this reason. There is strong consensus that topic relevance and community contribution are primary drivers for accepting review invitations.
In contrast, personal connections show much less influence. Knowing the editor requesting the review received mixed responses, with most experts selecting "Never," "Rarely," or "Sometimes." Even more definitive, knowing the paper's authors was predominantly rated as "Never" or "Rarely" as a reason to accept reviews, with many experts explicitly noting this would represent a conflict of interest.
A small number of experts mentioned additional motivations including career development benefits, receiving honoraria or vouchers for their own publications, and personal interest in specific research topics.
Summary Generated by AI
Answer Explanations
- user-412689
Never Rarely Sometimes Frequently To contribute to the scientific community 0 0 1 0 Because I want to learn/stay current in my field 0 0 0 1 Topic is relevant to my expertise 0 0 0 1 I personally know the editor asking me to review 1 0 0 0 Because I personally know or know of the authors of the paper 1 0 0 0 Other (please explain) 0 0 0 1 Because its good for my career. - user-905834
Never Rarely Sometimes Frequently To contribute to the scientific community 0 0 0 1 Because I want to learn/stay current in my field 0 0 0 1 Topic is relevant to my expertise 0 0 0 1 I personally know the editor asking me to review 1 0 0 0 Because I personally know or know of the authors of the paper 1 0 0 0 Other (please explain) 1 0 0 0 I focus on the quality of publications and my expertise to enhance them. - user-439026
Never Rarely Sometimes Frequently To contribute to the scientific community 0 0 1 0 Because I want to learn/stay current in my field 0 0 0 1 Topic is relevant to my expertise 0 0 1 0 I personally know the editor asking me to review 0 1 0 0 Because I personally know or know of the authors of the paper 1 0 0 0 Other (please explain) 0 1 0 0 I concentratedd on my speciality and focused on the significance of the work - user-740731
Never Rarely Sometimes Frequently To contribute to the scientific community 0 0 0 1 Because I want to learn/stay current in my field 0 0 0 1 Topic is relevant to my expertise 0 0 0 1 I personally know the editor asking me to review 0 0 1 0 Because I personally know or know of the authors of the paper 1 0 0 0 Other (please explain) None - user-832173
Never Rarely Sometimes Frequently To contribute to the scientific community 0 0 0 1 Because I want to learn/stay current in my field 0 0 0 1 Topic is relevant to my expertise 0 0 0 1 I personally know the editor asking me to review 1 0 0 0 Because I personally know or know of the authors of the paper 1 0 0 0 Other (please explain) 1 0 0 0 I like to perform peer review but I don't like to perform a peer review only because it is a conflict of interest connected to authors or editor. - user-958242
Never Rarely Sometimes Frequently To contribute to the scientific community 0 0 0 1 Because I want to learn/stay current in my field 0 0 1 0 Topic is relevant to my expertise 0 0 0 1 I personally know the editor asking me to review 1 0 0 0 Because I personally know or know of the authors of the paper 1 0 0 0 Other (please explain) 1 0 0 0 This is a contribution to Clinical services and indirectly to patient care - user-986977
Never Rarely Sometimes Frequently To contribute to the scientific community 0 0 0 1 Because I want to learn/stay current in my field 0 0 1 0 Topic is relevant to my expertise 0 1 0 0 I personally know the editor asking me to review 1 0 0 0 Because I personally know or know of the authors of the paper 1 0 0 0 Other (please explain) 0 0 1 0 Renumeration - user-135565
Never Rarely Sometimes Frequently To contribute to the scientific community 0 0 0 1 Because I want to learn/stay current in my field 0 0 0 1 Topic is relevant to my expertise 0 0 0 1 I personally know the editor asking me to review 1 0 0 0 Because I personally know or know of the authors of the paper 1 0 0 0 Other (please explain) N/A - user-295767
Never Rarely Sometimes Frequently To contribute to the scientific community 0 0 0 1 Because I want to learn/stay current in my field 0 0 0 1 Topic is relevant to my expertise 0 0 0 1 I personally know the editor asking me to review 0 0 1 0 Because I personally know or know of the authors of the paper 0 1 0 0 Other (please explain) It’s a worthwhile activity. - user-861466
Never Rarely Sometimes Frequently To contribute to the scientific community 0 0 0 1 Because I want to learn/stay current in my field 0 0 1 0 Topic is relevant to my expertise 0 0 0 1 I personally know the editor asking me to review 0 1 0 0 Because I personally know or know of the authors of the paper 1 0 0 0 Other (please explain) Usually the authors are anonymous - user-990104
Never Rarely Sometimes Frequently To contribute to the scientific community 1 0 0 0 Because I want to learn/stay current in my field 0 1 0 0 Topic is relevant to my expertise 0 0 1 0 I personally know the editor asking me to review 0 0 0 1 Because I personally know or know of the authors of the paper 1 0 0 0 Other (please explain) 0 0 0 1 They pay me. - user-589440
Never Rarely Sometimes Frequently To contribute to the scientific community 0 0 0 1 Because I want to learn/stay current in my field 0 0 1 0 Topic is relevant to my expertise 0 0 1 0 I personally know the editor asking me to review 1 0 0 0 Because I personally know or know of the authors of the paper 1 0 0 0 Other (please explain) 0 0 0 1 I frecuently accept to peer review a manuscript because I find the topic interesting. - user-676638
Never Rarely Sometimes Frequently To contribute to the scientific community 0 0 0 1 Because I want to learn/stay current in my field 0 0 0 1 Topic is relevant to my expertise 0 0 0 1 I personally know the editor asking me to review 0 0 1 0 Because I personally know or know of the authors of the paper 0 1 0 0 Other (please explain) 0 0 0 1 When the topic is within my expertise, and I am offered some honorarium (minimum around $100), I am most likely to accept the review assignments. - user-535129
Never Rarely Sometimes Frequently To contribute to the scientific community 0 0 0 1 Because I want to learn/stay current in my field 0 0 0 1 Topic is relevant to my expertise 0 0 0 1 I personally know the editor asking me to review 1 0 0 0 Because I personally know or know of the authors of the paper 1 0 0 0 Other (please explain) 1 0 0 0 Vouchers - user-266855
Never Rarely Sometimes Frequently To contribute to the scientific community 0 0 1 0 Because I want to learn/stay current in my field 0 1 0 0 Topic is relevant to my expertise 0 0 0 1 I personally know the editor asking me to review 0 0 1 0 Because I personally know or know of the authors of the paper 1 0 0 0 Other (please explain) 0 0 0 1 Peer review is an output required by my work thus I complete what I can, but I prefer to review for journals that provide a discount on APCs for reviews. - user-105846
Never Rarely Sometimes Frequently To contribute to the scientific community 0 0 0 1 Because I want to learn/stay current in my field 0 0 0 1 Topic is relevant to my expertise 0 0 0 1 I personally know the editor asking me to review 1 0 0 0 Because I personally know or know of the authors of the paper 1 0 0 0 Other (please explain) 1 0 0 0 Most of the papers are blinded. - user-15180
Never Rarely Sometimes Frequently To contribute to the scientific community 0 0 0 1 Because I want to learn/stay current in my field 0 0 0 1 Topic is relevant to my expertise 0 0 0 1 I personally know the editor asking me to review 0 0 1 0 Because I personally know or know of the authors of the paper 0 0 1 0 Other (please explain) 0 0 1 0 Curiosity to know the content as I am interested in the respective field of research - user-548125
Never Rarely Sometimes Frequently To contribute to the scientific community 0 1 0 0 Because I want to learn/stay current in my field 0 0 1 0 Topic is relevant to my expertise 0 0 0 1 I personally know the editor asking me to review 0 1 0 0 Because I personally know or know of the authors of the paper 1 0 0 0 Other (please explain) the goal and the topic that interests me or that I know very well are always in the first place - user-84898
Never Rarely Sometimes Frequently To contribute to the scientific community 0 1 0 0 Because I want to learn/stay current in my field 0 0 1 0 Topic is relevant to my expertise 0 0 1 0 I personally know the editor asking me to review 1 0 0 0 Because I personally know or know of the authors of the paper 1 0 0 0 Other (please explain) 0 0 0 1 This answer may not be the most politically correct, but my main driver for accepting reviewer invitations is my own career development. - user-962329
Never Rarely Sometimes Frequently To contribute to the scientific community 0 0 0 1 Because I want to learn/stay current in my field 0 0 0 1 Topic is relevant to my expertise 0 0 0 1 I personally know the editor asking me to review 0 1 0 0 Because I personally know or know of the authors of the paper 1 0 0 0 Other (please explain) 1 0 0 0 I see it as duty to science move forward. I introduce students to the review process. - user-755233
Never Rarely Sometimes Frequently To contribute to the scientific community 0 0 0 1 Because I want to learn/stay current in my field 0 0 0 1 Topic is relevant to my expertise 0 0 0 1 I personally know the editor asking me to review 1 0 0 0 Because I personally know or know of the authors of the paper 1 0 0 0 Other (please explain) 0 0 0 1 Rank of the journal - user-742139
Never Rarely Sometimes Frequently To contribute to the scientific community 0 0 0 1 Because I want to learn/stay current in my field 0 0 0 1 Topic is relevant to my expertise 0 0 0 1 I personally know the editor asking me to review 0 0 0 1 Because I personally know or know of the authors of the paper 1 0 0 0 Other (please explain) "Because I personally know or know of the authors of the paper" is a conflict of interest. - user-961571
Never Rarely Sometimes Frequently To contribute to the scientific community 0 0 0 1 Because I want to learn/stay current in my field 0 0 0 1 Topic is relevant to my expertise 0 0 0 1 I personally know the editor asking me to review 1 0 0 0 Because I personally know or know of the authors of the paper 1 0 0 0 Other (please explain) 0 0 1 0 The title and the abstract sometime are too catchy that I will just accept to learn. - user-103012
Never Rarely Sometimes Frequently To contribute to the scientific community 0 0 0 1 Because I want to learn/stay current in my field 0 0 0 1 Topic is relevant to my expertise 0 0 1 0 I personally know the editor asking me to review 1 0 0 0 Because I personally know or know of the authors of the paper 1 0 0 0 Other (please explain) To expand my scope of expertise and experience - user-980558
Never Rarely Sometimes Frequently To contribute to the scientific community 0 1 0 0 Because I want to learn/stay current in my field 0 1 0 0 Topic is relevant to my expertise 0 1 0 0 I personally know the editor asking me to review 1 0 0 0 Because I personally know or know of the authors of the paper 1 0 0 0 Other (please explain) To contribute to the scientific community | Frequently | I believe peer review is a vital part of maintaining research integrity and improving the quality of published work. Reviewing allows me to give back to the community and support fellow researchers.Because I want to learn/stay current in my field | Frequently | Reviewing exposes me to cutting-edge research and helps me stay updated with the latest advancements and methodologies.Topic is relevant to my expertise | Frequently | I accept reviews when they align closely with my knowledge and experience, ensuring I can provide meaningful feedback.I personally know the editor asking me to review | Sometimes | While personal connections may influence my decision, I prioritize relevance and contribution over personal relationships.Because I personally know or know of the authors of the paper | Rarely | I strive to maintain impartiality in the review process and generally avoid conflicts of interest. However, if I am familiar with the author’s work (not personally), I might still consider reviewing if I can remain objective.. - user-314109
Never Rarely Sometimes Frequently To contribute to the scientific community 0 0 0 1 Because I want to learn/stay current in my field 0 0 1 0 Topic is relevant to my expertise 0 0 0 1 I personally know the editor asking me to review 1 0 0 0 Because I personally know or know of the authors of the paper 1 0 0 0 Other (please explain) 1 0 0 0 . - user-60284
Never Rarely Sometimes Frequently To contribute to the scientific community 0 0 0 1 Because I want to learn/stay current in my field 0 0 0 1 Topic is relevant to my expertise 0 0 0 1 I personally know the editor asking me to review 0 1 0 0 Because I personally know or know of the authors of the paper 0 1 0 0 Other (please explain) 0 1 0 0 Sometime peer-reviewing because of the paper is relevant for my area of expertise - user-226593
Never Rarely Sometimes Frequently To contribute to the scientific community 0 0 0 1 Because I want to learn/stay current in my field 0 0 1 0 Topic is relevant to my expertise 0 0 0 1 I personally know the editor asking me to review 1 0 0 0 Because I personally know or know of the authors of the paper 1 0 0 0 Other (please explain) I have strong interest to develop my academic contribution in my expertise and enhance publication experience. - user-261073
Never Rarely Sometimes Frequently To contribute to the scientific community 0 0 0 1 Because I want to learn/stay current in my field 0 0 0 1 Topic is relevant to my expertise 0 0 0 1 I personally know the editor asking me to review 0 1 0 0 Because I personally know or know of the authors of the paper 1 0 0 0 Other (please explain) Missing from areas of expertise, below: Qualitative methods, Integrative Health, Health Equity, Social Epidemiologuy - user-863596
Never Rarely Sometimes Frequently To contribute to the scientific community 0 0 0 1 Because I want to learn/stay current in my field 0 0 1 0 Topic is relevant to my expertise 0 0 1 0 I personally know the editor asking me to review 1 0 0 0 Because I personally know or know of the authors of the paper 0 1 0 0 Other (please explain) 0 0 1 0 Nothing to say but collect vouchers for my personal publication in the Open access - user-354296
Never Rarely Sometimes Frequently To contribute to the scientific community 0 0 0 1 Because I want to learn/stay current in my field 0 0 0 1 Topic is relevant to my expertise 0 0 0 1 I personally know the editor asking me to review 1 0 0 0 Because I personally know or know of the authors of the paper 1 0 0 0 Other (please explain) 0 0 0 1 personal interest and satisfaction - user-90744
Never Rarely Sometimes Frequently To contribute to the scientific community 0 0 0 1 Because I want to learn/stay current in my field 0 0 0 1 Topic is relevant to my expertise 0 0 0 1 I personally know the editor asking me to review 1 0 0 0 Because I personally know or know of the authors of the paper 1 0 0 0 Other (please explain) I always prefer annonymus review process - user-983270
Never Rarely Sometimes Frequently To contribute to the scientific community 0 0 0 1 Because I want to learn/stay current in my field 0 0 0 1 Topic is relevant to my expertise 0 0 0 1 I personally know the editor asking me to review 1 0 0 0 Because I personally know or know of the authors of the paper 1 0 0 0 Other (please explain) It is part of building a seniority level - user-683654
Never Rarely Sometimes Frequently To contribute to the scientific community 0 0 0 1 Because I want to learn/stay current in my field 0 0 1 0 Topic is relevant to my expertise 0 0 0 1 I personally know the editor asking me to review 0 1 0 0 Because I personally know or know of the authors of the paper 0 1 0 0 Other (please explain) 0 1 0 0 Knowing the writer of an article or knowing the editors has never been my consideration. - user-940118
Never Rarely Sometimes Frequently To contribute to the scientific community 0 0 0 1 Because I want to learn/stay current in my field 0 0 0 1 Topic is relevant to my expertise 0 0 0 1 I personally know the editor asking me to review 0 1 0 0 Because I personally know or know of the authors of the paper 1 0 0 0 Other (please explain) The answqer is the same as above - user-558408
Never Rarely Sometimes Frequently To contribute to the scientific community 0 0 0 1 Because I want to learn/stay current in my field 0 0 0 1 Topic is relevant to my expertise 0 0 0 1 I personally know the editor asking me to review 1 0 0 0 Because I personally know or know of the authors of the paper 1 0 0 0 Other (please explain) I enjoy reviewing scientific manuscripts. - user-587566
Never Rarely Sometimes Frequently To contribute to the scientific community 0 0 0 1 Because I want to learn/stay current in my field 0 0 0 1 Topic is relevant to my expertise 0 0 0 1 I personally know the editor asking me to review 0 0 0 1 Because I personally know or know of the authors of the paper 0 0 0 1 Other (please explain) Mentorship and Teaching - user-819455
Never Rarely Sometimes Frequently To contribute to the scientific community 0 0 0 1 Because I want to learn/stay current in my field 0 0 1 0 Topic is relevant to my expertise 0 0 0 1 I personally know the editor asking me to review 1 0 0 0 Because I personally know or know of the authors of the paper 1 0 0 0 Other (please explain) 1 0 0 0 I would not accept a review if I knew the author. - user-71516
Never Rarely Sometimes Frequently To contribute to the scientific community 0 0 0 1 Because I want to learn/stay current in my field 0 0 1 0 Topic is relevant to my expertise 0 0 1 0 I personally know the editor asking me to review 1 0 0 0 Because I personally know or know of the authors of the paper 1 0 0 0 Other (please explain) 1 0 0 0 NA - user-333723
Never Rarely Sometimes Frequently To contribute to the scientific community 0 0 0 1 Because I want to learn/stay current in my field 0 0 0 1 Topic is relevant to my expertise 0 0 0 1 I personally know the editor asking me to review 1 0 0 0 Because I personally know or know of the authors of the paper 1 0 0 0 Other (please explain) 1 0 0 0 I accept a peer review invitation when the manuscript aligns with my expertise, allowing me to provide a meaningful evaluation, and when I have sufficient time to conduct a thorough review. I also consider the scientific relevance and quality of the study, as well as my interest in the topic. Additionally, I see peer reviewing as an opportunity to contribute to the academic community, stay updated on recent research, and engage in constructive scientific discourse.
user-496176
02/26/2025 06:57I like to review because I myself am interested in learning more.
user-763126
02/27/2025 05:50user-442918
04/12/2025 11:09