Results
(40 Answers)

The survey on the current state of peer review reveals strong consensus that improvement is needed, with 19 experts (48%) rating it as "Fair - significant room for improvement." This represents the clear majority view.

There is notable disagreement on the severity of issues:

  • 10 experts (25%) were more positive, rating peer review as "Good - mostly effective with minor issues"
  • 3 experts (8%) identified "Poor - major problems that need addressing"
  • 2 experts (5%) indicated a "Crisis - fundamental changes needed"
  • Only 2 experts (5%) rated the system as "Excellent - working very well"

Among the few who provided explanations, concerns were raised about reviews being "superficial, uncritical, non-constructive," and publications being "rather descriptive than scientific."

Summary Generated by AI

Answer Explanations

  • Excellent - working very well
    user-958242
    Getting mainly peer review tasks from area of expertise.
  • Fair - significant room for improvement
    user-983537
    Many reviews are superficial, uncritical, non-constructive, unnecessarily adversarial or self-promoting
  • Fair - significant room for improvement
    user-858214
    A lot of publications are rather descriptive than scientific
  • Good - mostly effective with minor issues
    user-709065
    NOT APPLICABLE
0
user-356918
10/07/2025 03:22
fair and poor
Please log in to comment.