Why some journals did not accept the bibliometric or scientometric based papers? since this is the techniques to identify the current trends of any selected field in science.

I want to know (in a paragraph form) on how we can share the opportunity of this writing techniques of bibliometric or scientometric based papers with others too
Addiction Agriculture Analytical chemistry Analytical toxicology Aquatic toxicology
Rolf Teschke
Yes, there may be reasons to reject publications on scientometric investigations, but the topic has a high priority among scientists. An example is: Front Pharmacol 2020, 11, 842. This is a perfect paper related to DILI (drug induced liver injury). 
There can be various reasons why some journals may not accept bibliometric or scientometric-based papers. Here are some possible explanations:

  1. Scope of the journal
  2. Lack of originality
  3. Methodological limitations
  4. Lack of significance
  5. Limited readership

It is worth noting that not all journals have the same criteria for accepting papers, and what may be considered unacceptable by one journal may be acceptable to another. Therefore, it is important to carefully select the appropriate journal for your research and to understand its specific criteria for acceptance.
This is not a yes/no question and answer. There are tons of reasons of desk rejection. But it does not mean that "journals do not accept such kind of paper." 
Fran Astorga
At least what I have observed, Systematic reviews and bibliometric analyses are not widely recognized as a "research paper"; instead, they are considered as "reviews", similarly to State of the Art, os Scope manuscripts. They are usually not considered as a "study", eventhought they do have a methodology, analyses and reproductible methodology. 
Farrokh Habibzadeh
It might be because the topic of the submitted manuscript (bibliometric and scientometric) does not fit the aim and scope of the manuscript. There are journals such as Scientometrics and Journal of Informetrics that publish such submissions. Other common cause would be lack of novelty in the submission. Journals prefer to publish original reports. 
Azevedo,Luís Peres
Because the trend is to privilegiate researchers with a high level of testing , laboratorial or modeling methods . They are more inovative and can increase the volume of discovers in sciences.
Shakil Saghir
This is a question I pondered a lot, especially when a paper is sent back without sending to reviewers while meeting all aspects of the publication for that journal, I think this to be unfair to the authors; I understand this when a paper is not meeting the scope of the journal. I found few journals to be more accepting than others. I think this is due to the number of papers they receive which may be not possible to publish and thus first-cut by the editors by rejecting before sending to review. 
Dr Ayman Elnahry
It is possible that the editor values these kinds of paper but prefer not to have in his journal due to other constraints or preference for original research.

Post an Answer

Sign In to Answer