What makes a research scholar more impressive, few publications showing independent research or multiple collaborative publications with n number of authors, many affiliations?
Its a dilemma for any researcher to go for number of publications collaborating with n number of authors in different affiliations or few independent good quality publication revealing the purity of idea. So I welcome the thoughts of the recruiters/experts in the field to give response against the query. The responders may rephrase the question if it is not covered completely
Biotechnology
Cell biology
Diabetes
Dose-response modeling
Drug delivery
M. Lemaalem
The individual or small group research not only provides valuable training but also encompasses the diverse research processes from ideation to publication. Collaborative research involving multiple groups can yield high-quality papers and foster the enhancement of teamwork skills. This multifaceted approach not only strengthens the profile but also aligns with the recruiter's expectations for a candidate with a well-rounded skill set and a nuanced understanding of the research landscape.