Pings
-
0 Answers 0 Votes
is better to write scientific paper alone or with participants ?
is better to write scientific paper alone or with participants ?
-
0 Answers 0 Votes
Are there easily available options for scientists in foreign countries if they don't find suitable job in home country.
It asks for different opinions from people from different countries.
-
Answer Accepted 35 Answers 26 Votes
Do you think that H index reflect experience?
H- index in any database such as google scholar, Scopus, web of Science
-
0 Answers 0 Votes
For a change in the peer-reveiwing as an urgent need?
With an increasing number of Journal and other publication, the review by peer started to be difficult and very often nonqualified reviewers are solicited. Very often now the Journal send us a list that ressemble the directory a. This is a problem since many of the persons listed here do not have even a record over 10 and there are supposed to review works they don't know, and they are not qualified. I would like to start a huge discussion that can be sent to the main Journal to change the...
-
Answer Accepted 7 Answers 7 Votes
How publication retractions should be handled?
With an alarming rise in number of retracted papers, what the scientific community thinks is the best way to handle them? 1. Should be ignored, giving benefit-of-doubt to the authors 2. Authors with multiple retracted papers should be demoted 3. Organizations with high retraction rates should be banned from entering various rankings, and debar them from government funding for 1-2 years 4. Court trials against the faulty researchers for criminal wastage of public money
-
1 Answer 0 Votes
Do you think general physicians or medical doctors might be redundant when AGI is fully developed?
This is a burning topic in medical or clinicians' circles globally as it might have the potential to shake up the medical profession due to the concerted efforts by AI enthusiasts by questioning the relevance of the doctors e.g. general physicians if not all (e.g. medial surgeons or specialists). This may be a challenge for the future healthcare planners and might need a thorough debate. The following reference might give a glimpse and assist while answering for my ping question. Kazzazi F....
-
2 Answers 0 Votes
Should Impact Factor be the standard for judging how sound a journal is?
Impact Factor is about citations and not necessarily quality
-
3 Answers 2 Votes
What is the most important part of a scientific article? Let's approach this seriously! Part 2
I have read all the responses to my question, and I find that, except for one, they are largely absurd. There is talk of methodology and results, but as the famous saying goes, “There are lies, big lies, and statistics.” Many articles submitted for publication manipulate data that is either highly misleading or not original at all. I’m unsure if this will be approved on Scipion. What is the most important part of a scientific article? Let’s approach this seriously! I am not at all surprised...
-
4 Answers 3 Votes
How do you justify (or would you justify) a new research study to ensure it doesn’t unnecessarily duplicate previous work or repeat past methodological mistakes?
I’m currently working on a PhD thesis focused on Evidence-Based Research (EBR), particularly on how researchers use (or fail to use) prior evidence (similar studies), to justify and design new research. I’d love to hear real-world experiences, whether from preparing research proposals or evaluating them. Do you use any structured or unstructured method to be aware of all relevant prior research? How do you support your judgments (e.g., demonstrating that no prior studies exist, or that...
-
Answer Accepted 1 Answer 0 Votes
Why do in vitro studies often show ideal results for new techniques, while clinical outcome studies show no significant difference compared to conventional treatments?
In Endodontics specifically: 1. Irrigation techniques (e.g., GentleWave, PUI): • In vitro: Often show superior bacterial reduction compared to conventional syringe irrigation. • Outcome studies: Many show no statistically significant difference in long-term healing or success rates (e.g., JOE 2022, 2024 papers). • 2. Root canal sealers (e.g., bioceramics vs epoxy): • In vitro: Bioceramic sealers demonstrate better properties (e.g., antimicrobial, biocompatibility). • Outcome studies: No...
Pings FAQ
What is a Ping?
A Ping is a single science-based question. The question comes from a fellow SciPinion Expert who is seeking input from the expert community. All participation in this service (i.e. asking or answering questions) is voluntary and anonymous if you prefer.
Can I post a Ping?
Yes, all SciPinion Experts are able to ask questions for the expert community to answer, provided you have Ping Credits. All Experts start with 3 Ping Credits (i.e., can ask 3 questions), and have the opportunity to earn more (e.g., by answering Pings from other experts, applying to panel opportunities).
Can I sponsor a Paid Ping?
Yes, please contact SciPinion if you would like to sponsor a Paid Ping.
What do I get for answering a Ping?
By answering a question from a fellow SciPinion Expert you earn 1 Ping Credit, which allows you to sponsor your own Ping (e.g., for every question you answer, you can ask your own question)
You also receive the satisfaction of helping your fellow experts and supporting the scientific community.