2
SciPoll 685: Funding Bias
Have you ever decided not to trust or use a scientific study's findings because of its funding source?
Results
(96 Answers)
Answer Explanations
- UnsureMeikoTI think that is a proposal is well written, it should have the chance to be funded.
- Yesuser-477751Some NGO-supported "reports" used inadequate methods and overstated importance of results
- Yesuser-658650I found some biomedical research studies where there is clear conflict of interest between the research goal and the private funding body supplying the resources.
- Yesuser-606148if the study is sponsored by a company and concerns one of their products or services, or a policy related to their line of business, then I will examine particularly carefully the potential sources of bias. If funding or conflicts of interest are not reported, then it's a problem.
- Yesuser-753537highly depending on the authors and research institutes involved, whether protocols were submitted before the start of the study, and the quality of reporting of the paper!
- Yesuser-208427Tobacco research
- Yesuser-445218I have seen data skewed in published work to the point where I had to assemble a piece to straighten it out.
- Yesuser-99889company funded clinical results are more often than less arguable at a minimum
- Yesuser-771432funding from businesses (e.g. pharmaceutical companies) are tainted by bias
- Nouser-813282Usually we buy chemicals and equipment, we do not purchase scientific results
- Yesuser-287804If the funding was from a pharmaceutical company and results were in favor of their marketed drug, I'll be skeptical of the findings.
- Nouser-683654I still try to get funding from outside my country because when I started out in research, I got three fundings that seriously helped my research output to the extent of winning the Liquefied Natural Gas Limited Prize for Science.
- Yesuser-526415I had doubts, especially when the conflict of interest was not properly disclosed.
- Nouser-876062No, I have not decided to distrust or avoid using the findings of a scientific study solely because of its funding source. However, I always consider the transparency and potential influence of the sponsors on the research. It’s important to examine the study's methodology, the authors' credibility, and other contextual factors before drawing any conclusions
- Nouser-179600No, conducting scientific research requires funding organization.
- Nouser-93827I rather judge the data presented
- Nouser-531362I believe that if there is commitment from the donor community then it is credible.
- Yesuser-379007This is specifically noted when the sponsor is engaging in any commercial activity or interest related in a way to the study ideas being tested.
- Nouser-351505But I look at the funding source when I review a scientific study