Results
(8 Answers)

Most experts (7 out of 8) agree that methods exist for confirmational analysis of small sample quantities in microplastic/nanoplastic studies. DSC (Differential Scanning Calorimetry) was most frequently mentioned, with experts noting that standard DSC requires 0.5-5 mg, while micro/nano DSC variants can work with smaller quantities (<1 mg).

Other recommended methods include:

  • NMR - typically requires >1 mg, though microcoil NMR can work with <100 µg
  • Mass spectrometry - including Pyr-GC/MS, LC-MS/MS, MALDI-TOF, and ESI-MS
  • Spectroscopy - FT-IR and Raman
  • Other techniques - Thermogravimetric Analysis and XPS

The dissenting expert (Expert 9) indicated their experience was limited to non-biological tissues with higher sample quantities, suggesting these methods may be less applicable in biological contexts with smaller samples.

Summary Generated by AI

Answer Explanations

  • No
    Expert 9
    My experience is with non-biological tissues where sample quantities are higher and/or matrix effects are lower, and thus FT-IR for example is appropriate for confirmational analysis - i.e. spectral matching to identify MNPs as specific polymers, with associated (un)certainty.
  • Yes
    Expert 3
    DSC can confirm polymer identity via thermal fingerprint, requiring 0.5–5 mg, but micro-DSC variants can use <1 mg. It may be useful identifying polymer blends. NMR can be used for identifying co-polymers or oxidized plastics and requires, typically, >1 mg, but microcoil NMR can work with <100 µg.
  • Yes
    Expert 4
    DSC and NMR are indeed suited options also considering the quantities typically available. In addition, FT-IR and RAMAN spectroscopy might be useful, as well as Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF, ESI-MS) and Thermogravimetric Analysis. In some cases, XPS migth be of added value.
  • Yes
    Expert 2
     There are several analytical methods that  could provide confirmatory or complementary analysis using  small sample quantities commonly available in microplastic and nanoplastic studies. These techniques could be effective at the microgram to low milligram scale, making them suited for the studies of limited biological or environmental samples. However, each method has  strict limitations regarding the  information that they could  provide with such small quantities, like  chemical structure, crystallinity, thermal properties, or molecular weight. 
  • Yes
    Expert 1
    Mass spectrometric methods.  
    While pyrolysis GCMS is becoming popular in MNP analysis, a few studies analyzing biological samples utilized alternative mass spectrometric methods using LC-MS/MS, which is more confirmatory (see Zhang et al., 2021, Environ. Sci. Technol. Letters, 8, 989-994).  Polymers can be depolymerized to produce monomers and those monomers can be analyzed using LC-MS/MS.  In this case, monomers analyzed before and after depolymerization can be subtracted to yield plastic type in the units of mass of a specific plastic.  
  • Yes
    Expert 8
    DSC can be used as a confirmational method. Limits of detection for DSC are published for very small microplastics (Lynch et al. 2024 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2024.123607
  • Yes
    Expert 6
    There is nano DSC technique available. For NMR, which is most confirmational technique, small sample quantities are challenging. 
  • Yes
    Expert 7
    Some methods are quite sensitive and small sample quantities are enough, Pyr-GC/MS for example. 
1 vote 1 0 votes
Expert 4
07/31/2025 05:13
There is agreement on the options that are available and it might be good to inlcude them in the manuscript
0
Expert 5
07/31/2025 20:14
In addition to expert 4's debate comment, the authors should be more precise in their use of "methods", "samples", and "small". For example it would be better to use analytes instead of "samples" and "small" is a non quantitative term.
Comments are closed for this page.