4.9
SciPi 770: Best Practices: Detecting and Quantifying Micro- Nanoplastics (MNP) in Biological Tissues
Are there methods that can utilize the small sample quantities most typically available and provide confirmational analysis (DSC, NMR, etc)?
Results
(8 Answers)
Most experts (7 out of 8) agree that methods exist for confirmational analysis of small sample quantities in microplastic/nanoplastic studies. DSC (Differential Scanning Calorimetry) was most frequently mentioned, with experts noting that standard DSC requires 0.5-5 mg, while micro/nano DSC variants can work with smaller quantities (<1 mg).
Other recommended methods include:
- NMR - typically requires >1 mg, though microcoil NMR can work with <100 µg
- Mass spectrometry - including Pyr-GC/MS, LC-MS/MS, MALDI-TOF, and ESI-MS
- Spectroscopy - FT-IR and Raman
- Other techniques - Thermogravimetric Analysis and XPS
The dissenting expert (Expert 9) indicated their experience was limited to non-biological tissues with higher sample quantities, suggesting these methods may be less applicable in biological contexts with smaller samples.
Summary Generated by AI
Answer Explanations
- NoExpert 9My experience is with non-biological tissues where sample quantities are higher and/or matrix effects are lower, and thus FT-IR for example is appropriate for confirmational analysis - i.e. spectral matching to identify MNPs as specific polymers, with associated (un)certainty.
- YesExpert 3DSC can confirm polymer identity via thermal fingerprint, requiring 0.5–5 mg, but micro-DSC variants can use <1 mg. It may be useful identifying polymer blends. NMR can be used for identifying co-polymers or oxidized plastics and requires, typically, >1 mg, but microcoil NMR can work with <100 µg.
- YesExpert 4DSC and NMR are indeed suited options also considering the quantities typically available. In addition, FT-IR and RAMAN spectroscopy might be useful, as well as Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF, ESI-MS) and Thermogravimetric Analysis. In some cases, XPS migth be of added value.
- YesExpert 2There are several analytical methods that could provide confirmatory or complementary analysis using small sample quantities commonly available in microplastic and nanoplastic studies. These techniques could be effective at the microgram to low milligram scale, making them suited for the studies of limited biological or environmental samples. However, each method has strict limitations regarding the information that they could provide with such small quantities, like chemical structure, crystallinity, thermal properties, or molecular weight.
- YesExpert 1Mass spectrometric methods.
While pyrolysis GCMS is becoming popular in MNP analysis, a few studies analyzing biological samples utilized alternative mass spectrometric methods using LC-MS/MS, which is more confirmatory (see Zhang et al., 2021, Environ. Sci. Technol. Letters, 8, 989-994). Polymers can be depolymerized to produce monomers and those monomers can be analyzed using LC-MS/MS. In this case, monomers analyzed before and after depolymerization can be subtracted to yield plastic type in the units of mass of a specific plastic. - YesExpert 8DSC can be used as a confirmational method. Limits of detection for DSC are published for very small microplastics (Lynch et al. 2024 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2024.123607
- YesExpert 6There is nano DSC technique available. For NMR, which is most confirmational technique, small sample quantities are challenging.
- YesExpert 7Some methods are quite sensitive and small sample quantities are enough, Pyr-GC/MS for example.
Expert 4
07/31/2025 05:13Expert 5
07/31/2025 20:14