4
How do you see AI being harmful in your area of expertise?
Results
(138 Answers)
user-363282 wrote:
it can have malice in case of bugs
user-460715 wrote:
They are introducing errors in generating text.
user-732397 wrote:
Would it replace humans entirely? Doubtful, but.....
user-836505 wrote:
We need to recognize the limitations of AI in dealing with real-world high-risk situations. For instance, a poor motion planner can result in the loss of life.
user-153764 wrote:
unlikely
user-887788 wrote:
It currently generates fictitious responses. It may be used to replace expertise and quality will drop if it becomes the primary or main resource
user-50697 wrote:
Giving enough confidence to people without all the necessary knowledge on the subject, since chemistry is a very complex field, many theories are correlated and to consider only one AI affirmation about the topic you intend to work on can lead to big problems.
user-445218 wrote:
I do not.
user-156475 wrote:
Can't say at present. Too early
user-195977 wrote:
It is also being used for military and surveillance purposes, but this is always true. Drone attacks, killer humanoids, these things will happen and it is due to military and security concerns that will always be a part of the human experience. It is best to do as much research as possible in an open manner and avoid monopolization of new technology behind military funding. The playing field should stay as even as possible or it will be exploited by someone.
user-417392 wrote:
the use of AI without human validation in my area (medication safety) can be dangerous as it can lead to misinterpretation of results by the general public
user-270335 wrote:
Its use with mere commercial interests without waiting an appropriate validation
user-180652 wrote:
May be depended on by patients instead of getting professional help
user-234128 wrote:
Could lead to "automatization" of specific procedures (e.g., assessments, therapy), which would remove the human providers and decision-makers from part of the process. This would be rationalized as a cost-efficient or cost-saving measure.
user-628816 wrote:
Depending on it too much.
user-98823 wrote:
If such a literature search output is incorrectly biased, too much weight may be given to the wrong papers.
user-9932 wrote:
It may reduce a lot the number of activities being made by humans, especially collecting, organizing, and deriving models using data.
user-99098 wrote:
Already many published works rely on questionable assumptions, and wrong interpretation of data (for example, assuming you can say something from a particular technique when that is not the case). It will only get worse.
user-326793 wrote:
Wrong decision
user-263414 wrote:
teaching, misinformation
user-625125 wrote:
If the scientist do not check properly the outputs coming from the algorithms it could led to unuseful results and lost of time
user-627640 wrote:
too much dependence on the AI results
user-947988 wrote:
Social media fanatics suggesting Franken-plants again.
user-484966 wrote:
no too much
user-765513 wrote:
Students just doing cut copy paste without proper thinking and hard work
user-604521 wrote:
When facts are not checked and when methods that may not be reproducable are used
user-271773 wrote:
black box - hard to verify - competing interest
user-470071 wrote:
If AI will control motorized units it can produce errors that can do a lot of harm to a patient
user-340576 wrote:
ND
user-66641 wrote:
To do not realise the results
user-970956 wrote:
it could miss details
user-747249 wrote:
treatment
Overdiagnosis
user-276677 wrote:
computers and or AI should never be end responsible - e.g. in diagnostic or treatment decisions
user-511217 wrote:
I don't think so
user-389881 wrote:
no way
user-414626 wrote:
If the data are personal (less likely in ecotoxicology) I would be concerned that the data would get into the wrong hands.
user-277089 wrote:
There is a possibility that scientists will become too dependent on AI without checking the results for validity.
user-545783 wrote:
Possibility of false prediction may prevent reaching the correct result, but this possibility also exists in other in vitro and in vivo tests.
user-313917 wrote:
My concerns are related to the potential possibility of dual-use or malicious technology regarding high-consequence pathogens, high/maximum biocontainment facilities, biotechnology, and synthetic biology. My concerns are related to biosecurity.
user-898139 wrote:
There will be no harm.
user-123746 wrote:
Authorship, lack of proper AI citation and copy rights sheating and other research ethics guidelines.
user-883288 wrote:
I don’t
user-733609 wrote:
AI can be dangerous if scientists stay away from AI, AI can be pushed by irresponsible people for misleading uses
user-469485 wrote:
Specially younger generation is adopting AI tools that in due course of time, AI will be driving them. So, in short, technology will rule the mam.
user-943896 wrote:
When it is used without philosophy
user-637348 wrote:
Not harmful
user-292351 wrote:
It could potentially drive to relaxing the attention of genetic counselling operators and cause diagnostic errors
user-184231 wrote:
Incorrect utilization. Junk in still equals junk out. AI should not be used with no inderstanding of the underlying data or statistical analysis.
Sonne72 wrote:
Fraud.
user-667012 wrote:
The tendency to plagiarize from it
user-300423 wrote:
If used without care can give very wrong results and be difficult to supervise
user-156962 wrote:
Not sure
user-615872 wrote:
Wih optimism
user-599118 wrote:
AI might pose ethical issues especially if applied to human genetics and genomics.
user-556903 wrote:
There is always a danger that AI modelling will be used by researchers who are incompetent in AI and apply automatic ML tools "blindly". However, the main danger, in my opinion, is not selecting data for modelling too narrowly or too selectively. Failure to collect an adequate amount of data and, most importantly, to create an exhaustive list of factors and then "throw" this data into the model is the cause of wrong predictions and decisions. To avoid this data and feature engineering become very important. It is also the fuel for various pseudo-theories. Avoiding these effects is the main task of cooperation between the so-called domain specialists and AI specialists.
user-103828 wrote:
It may run protocol and may not be customized . clinical examinations and differentials need to be streamlined. This may potentially change .
user-870844 wrote:
In manuscript development and publishing
user-97558 wrote:
It may promote information overload
user-150822 wrote:
The result of AI might be misleading. Ìt should be validated
user-589379 wrote:
The tendency and the over-optimism that AI will solve all problems better than humans might lead to the situation, where human intelligence will be replaced by AI to the point where silliness and simplistic solutions without humand judgement will take over. In the end machines might tell humans what to do. Nick Bostrom is not so far off the mark with his warnings.
user-439415 wrote:
Wrong information
user-682252 wrote:
I could see AI replacing some juman jobs, for example that of pathologists that have classically analyzed juman biopsies using microscopy tools, which are time-consuming and are prone to human error. AI could help in the diagnosis of many diseases by feeding it with images of the biopsy tissue
user-663996 wrote:
By producing misleading results.
user-653283 wrote:
there is no harmful effect of AI on my expertise.
user-994669 wrote:
none
user-900806 wrote:
Data breach, plagarism
user-944765 wrote:
I am concerned that AI will exacerbate disparities as it is generative from what already exits out there---a lot of stereotypes...and it may lead to incorrect diagnoses of people as there are nuances to people's use of language when they discuss how they are feeling/symptoms
user-531362 wrote:
Man is a Social being and usually depends on social capital. If replaced by AI, man will become idle and lonely as their will be less time to interact and discuss issues
user-189534 wrote:
By taking decisions supported exclusively by AI
user-300516 wrote:
At the moment I do not see dangers for my area of expertise
user-902762 wrote:
الذكاء الاصطناعي لبعض المستخدمين "ويمكن أن يؤدي ذلك إلى أخطاء اصطناعية في جميع أنحاء العالم من المرضى، وخاصة البيانات الصحية وأمنها، بالإضافة إلى احتمالية الوصول إلى أشخاص غير مجتمعين".
user-102176 wrote:
Decision making and farm management practices based on AI will likely be dictated by single private company that owns the technology and algorithm.
user-470717 wrote:
It may be misleading sometimes.
user-171296 wrote:
AI may discourage critical thinking in favour of rapid throughput. This may lead to models being developed that describe data well, but are not predictive, and are unhelpful in enhancing understanding of new drugs and systems.
user-509498 wrote:
I believe that many individuals and organizations will rely on pre-trained networks created by larger entities, as smaller groups, institutions, and the like often lack the necessary data or computational resources to develop their own. However, this reliance means that any potential biases embedded in these widely-used networks could have far-reaching and significant impacts.
user-340804 wrote:
I see no harm from AI. I know that some people are afraid that AI can substitute them in the workspace, herewith I believe that the development and widespread of AI technologies will offer new types of employment.
user-297941 wrote:
Not at all harmful
user-695643 wrote:
AI can be incredibly harmful if used in its pre-mature stages for diagnostics and prognostics. If an AI model is deployed for diagnostics which is not robust, we will see far more false positives and false negatives, which will result in wasted resources and danger to life.
Moreover, if a sufficiently advanced AI falls into the wrong hands, it can be used to discover, design and manufacture harmful materials,
user-777357 wrote:
AI might ultimately become smarter than Homo sapiens (See work by Harari)
user-79617 wrote:
It may be harmful if the algorithms overdiagnose abnormalities in normal conditions, or underestimate the diagnoses in abnormal conditions.
user-740 wrote:
Data privacy
user-794592 wrote:
As I noted above, I believe AI can be very helpful in diagnosis and treatment planning our cases.
user-282806 wrote:
AI systems are usually a black box, therefore there is no learn effect from a AI algorithm
user-533989 wrote:
IN ITS UNCRITICAL APPLICATION TO LITERATURE SEARCHES.
user-520983 wrote:
I think individuals completely accepting what AI spits back to them as a totally correct conclusion can harm the progress of research especially if the AI model does not take certain factors into consideration.
user-578906 wrote:
Expecting database
user-331297 wrote:
No opinion
user-180243 wrote:
Use of poor quality data, which pollute the literature
user-37487 wrote:
As far as I understand, AI seeks backwords. Thus, it is a mere repetition of the knowledge it has acquired. The total replacement of humans bringing new ideas and pushing barriers is my worst fear.
user-477483 wrote:
If used without criteria can generate false information.
user-484050 wrote:
No
user-7366 wrote:
for those that are not in the discipline a lot of detailed information may induce more fear and anxiety.
user-310423 wrote:
If AI produces fake references (I have experienced that - so you must check every article carefully...
user-671388 wrote:
For companies and other parties to publish false information that supports their products.
user-211258 wrote:
AI can be misused to misinterpret and misreport the research by people who are inexperienced or lacking in integrity.
user-798662 wrote:
It can be harmful if it is used to engineer products which are unsafe and harmful to humans.
user-304247 wrote:
i dont think it is
user-914553 wrote:
Make mistakes that a human would not do.
user-250140 wrote:
many kinds of junk or fake data or theories to disturb true evidences
user-883671 wrote:
Maybe misused by students
user-137308 wrote:
It may stimulate people to just use AI to write their works.
user-988514 wrote:
Let AI working for you completely
user-9504 wrote:
Only insofar as we fail to properly account for intrinsic biases of AI tools
user-773118 wrote:
unclear
user-126526 wrote:
No, more good than harm.
user-307869 wrote:
For the moment I do not see any arm if it is used correctly.
user-140649 wrote:
People will relay on it and then make wrong decisions
user-913574 wrote:
Too high expectations lead to AI winters. Let's hope we are not getting into one.
user-82216 wrote:
Manipulation of data will be possible/easier.
user-382369 wrote:
It would be harmful when the data and its analyses are not properly downloaded/performed. Also, good criteria is needed to discern whether the results of the use of AI are or not.
user-391781 wrote:
Some cases are complex and the diagnosis rely heavily on clinical details, physical examination or even the expertise and experience of the pathologist. I feel that these considerations will not be properly addressed if we rely heavily on AI.
user-499104 wrote:
Abuse or missuse in tasks not understood by the person using it: statistics, rephrasing entire articles with little knowledge or expertise by the certain individual.
user-237934 wrote:
AI can analyze vast amounts of data and so can be a substitute for imaging professionals.
user-390499 wrote:
Misinformation.
user-880409 wrote:
Dependence by physicians will leads to gaps in care.
user-486614 wrote:
The ethical use of AI in neurology raises important questions, particularly in terms of patient privacy, consent, and the responsible handling of sensitive medical data. There's a need for clear guidelines and regulations to ensure ethical practices in the development and deployment of AI technologies in healthcare.
user-954693 wrote:
Ethical decisions
user-577966 wrote:
No harm noted as yet. As its usage increases, we will learn more about the harms it can cause.
user-534902 wrote:
While it may not be in the near future, AI could potentially dominate the field of diagnostic radiology in the later stages, possibly replacing doctors. However, it should not be forgotten that Radiology is a multidisciplinary field that requires a great deal of depth. For AI to achieve this, it needs time.
user-61436 wrote:
Not so muvh
user-844856 wrote:
It could be dangerous to try to do without the human part that exists in the specialty
user-181693 wrote:
If it is utilized and takes the art of medicine away from physicians to look at the entire picture of a patient and make the best decision.
user-606285 wrote:
I have several concerns on privacy and security issues, trasparency and quality of responses.
user-318554 wrote:
Any
user-95563 wrote:
Accuracy of knowledge regarding specificity of subject
user-719680 wrote:
Overreach into privacy. The continued issues with racist algorithms
user-269733 wrote:
Known information may be incorrect; risk of data fabrication
user-533285 wrote:
Social damage
user-180234 wrote:
AI that makes up responses is unacceptable and can be harmful to all disciplines. The AI released for use needs to prioritize accuracy and note when information is not available or when it can otherwise not respond to a request. Creativity with responses is very dangerous. For example, I received a reply with what looked like credible literature citations (i.e., the journal was one that would publish articles on the information requested) but, when I checked, they were all fabricated. Luckily I knew that the citations may be "hinky" and checked the citations....some people would not...yikes.
user-106770 wrote:
Overestimation. No more patient centered care, increased level social and psichosocial pathologic behavior.
user-911600 wrote:
Misses harmful effects
user-364672 wrote:
Can't see harm. Missuse is possible if responsibilities are ignored and mysteries expected. Likewise with any other technical advance.
user-434792 wrote:
Not at the very moment
user-856013 wrote:
Trying to be used in place of humans for psychotherapy
user-529270 wrote:
It may loose the hability to sense the peculiaritiies of individual variations and human sensible aspescts.
user-289373 wrote:
inaccurate diagnosis
user-577045 wrote:
Plagiarism and false reporting can also be done using AI
user-788615 wrote:
Although helps in finding things,but it limits the extraordinary thinking on a particular subject matters.