1.6
SciPi 770: Best Practices: Detecting and Quantifying Micro- Nanoplastics (MNP) in Biological Tissues
Should LOQs and LODs be reported for each analyte?
Results
(9 Answers)
All experts unanimously agree that LOQs and LODs should be reported for each analyte. The primary reasons include:
- Different response factors: Multiple experts (5, 6, 1) specifically note that different analytes have different response factors, particularly in techniques like Py-GC/MS.
- Sample-specific variations: Expert 8 emphasizes that LODs can vary based on the quantity extracted from each sample.
- Regulatory requirements: Expert 2 mentions that reporting LOQs and LODs is required by regulatory bodies like FDA, EPA, EMA, and ISO for method validation.
- Scientific transparency: Several experts (2, 4) highlight the importance for ensuring analytical accuracy, credibility, and reproducibility of studies.
Expert 7 notes this is "best practice" while Expert 4 adds that LOQs should be translated from analytical fluid to actual sample weights.
Summary Generated by AI
Answer Explanations
- Yes (please explain)Expert 3The Loqs may very depending on the analyte.
- Yes (please explain)Expert 9Where possible, this should be done.
- Yes (please explain)Expert 2Yes, both the LOQs and LODs should generally be reported for each analyte especially in scientific contexts such as pharmaceutical industry, environmental studies, clinical studies and food safety. Reporting the LOQs and LODs is essential for ensuring the analytical accuracy and credibility of the study. This is due to the fact, that different analytes exhibit distinct responses in different instruments like mass spectrometers or chromatographs. Additionally, LOQs and LODs are required to be reported by FDA, EPA, EMA, and ISO in method validation to ensure compliance and scientific rigor. Furthermore, reporting these will help enhance the transparency and reproducibility of the study, allowing others to assess whether the method is suitable for each target compound.
- Yes (please explain)Expert 4In principle: yes - again assuming that the purpose of the study is to report concentrations of MNP present in a sample. It is also needed to not only report the LOQ of the analytical fluid used (digest or extract) but it should also be added how this translates into the LOQ in actual samples of a specific weight.
- Yes (please explain)Expert 5For Py-GC/MS, each analyte has a different response factor, therefore the LOQ/LOD for each analyte will not be the same.
- Yes (please explain)Expert 6As each analyte should have different response factor on the selected technique and on different techniques. Thus, LOQs and LODs should reported for each analyte unless the technique has a universal detection mechanism. Then one set of LOQ/LOD is ok. But current there is no such technique to my knowledge.
- Yes (please explain)Expert 8Yes, especially for py-GCMS. I would go even farther that each sample can have a different LOD based on the quantity that was extracted.
- Yes (please explain)Expert 7This is the best practice to provide reliable results, and should be provided if time and funding allow.
- Yes (please explain)Expert 1While LOD/LOQ for each MNP type is not critical when spectroscopy/microscopy methods are used, reporting of LOD/LOQ for each MNP type is important for methods using pyrolysis GCMS. It is because sensitivity of MS towards each type of MNP is different. Pyrolysis GCMS measures mass of MNP not the number of MNP.
Expert 9
07/28/2025 07:18Expert 4
07/31/2025 02:37Expert 2
07/31/2025 06:53Expert 7
07/31/2025 08:33Expert 5
07/31/2025 11:31