Results
(9 Answers)

All experts unanimously agree that LOQs and LODs should be reported for each analyte. The primary reasons include:

  • Different response factors: Multiple experts (5, 6, 1) specifically note that different analytes have different response factors, particularly in techniques like Py-GC/MS.
  • Sample-specific variations: Expert 8 emphasizes that LODs can vary based on the quantity extracted from each sample.
  • Regulatory requirements: Expert 2 mentions that reporting LOQs and LODs is required by regulatory bodies like FDA, EPA, EMA, and ISO for method validation.
  • Scientific transparency: Several experts (2, 4) highlight the importance for ensuring analytical accuracy, credibility, and reproducibility of studies.

Expert 7 notes this is "best practice" while Expert 4 adds that LOQs should be translated from analytical fluid to actual sample weights.

Summary Generated by AI

Answer Explanations

  • Yes (please explain)
    Expert 3
    The Loqs may very depending on the analyte. 
  • Yes (please explain)
    Expert 9
    Where possible, this should be done. 
  • Yes (please explain)
    Expert 2
    Yes, both the LOQs and LODs should generally be reported for each analyte especially in scientific contexts such as pharmaceutical industry, environmental studies, clinical studies and food safety. Reporting the LOQs and LODs is essential for ensuring the analytical accuracy and credibility of the study. This is due to the fact, that different analytes exhibit distinct responses in different instruments like mass spectrometers or chromatographs. Additionally, LOQs and LODs  are required to be reported by  FDA, EPA, EMA, and ISO  in method validation to ensure compliance and scientific rigor. Furthermore, reporting these will help enhance the  transparency and reproducibility of the study, allowing others to assess whether the method is suitable for each target compound. 
  • Yes (please explain)
    Expert 4
    In principle: yes - again assuming that the purpose of the study is to report concentrations of MNP present in a sample. It is also needed to not only report the LOQ of the analytical fluid used (digest or extract) but it should also be added how this translates into the LOQ in actual samples of a specific weight.
  • Yes (please explain)
    Expert 5
    For Py-GC/MS, each analyte has a different response factor, therefore the LOQ/LOD for each analyte will not be the same.
  • Yes (please explain)
    Expert 6
    As each analyte should have different response factor on the selected technique and on different techniques. Thus, LOQs and LODs should reported for each analyte unless the technique has a universal detection mechanism. Then one set of LOQ/LOD is ok. But current there is no such technique to my knowledge. 
  • Yes (please explain)
    Expert 8
    Yes, especially for py-GCMS. I would go even farther that each sample can have a different LOD based on the quantity that was extracted. 
  • Yes (please explain)
    Expert 7
    This is the best practice to provide reliable results, and should be provided if time and funding allow. 
  • Yes (please explain)
    Expert 1
    While LOD/LOQ for each MNP type is not critical when spectroscopy/microscopy methods are used, reporting of LOD/LOQ for each MNP type is important for methods using pyrolysis GCMS.  It is because sensitivity of MS towards each type of MNP is different.  Pyrolysis GCMS measures mass of MNP not the number of MNP.
2 votes 2 0 votes
Expert 9
07/28/2025 07:18
The experts are unanimous on this point. They make some useful comments that the authors should take heed of. In particular, I like the comment that it should also be added how this translates into the LOQ in actual samples of a specific weight. This may seem obvious but it should not be assumed that less experienced readers of this article will do this unless specifically instructed.
0
Expert 4
07/31/2025 02:37
There is in general, consensus on this issue. I have nothing to add.
0
Expert 2
07/31/2025 06:53
 There is a clear consensus among the experts on this particular issue, and their collective feedback is both thoughtful and constructive. The authors should carefully consider and add these comments into their revised mansucript. 
0
Expert 7
07/31/2025 08:33
Ideally, yes. In practice, this could serve as a useful guideline.
0
Expert 5
07/31/2025 11:31
It is hard for one to imagine how to value a result without knowing where it lives in relation to the LOQ/LOD.
Comments are closed for this page.