Results
(109 Answers)

Answer Explanations 30

Yes
user-933346

More info on wearable and IoMT would be helpful

Yes
user-834630

The technology is booming recently and in order to properly train patients, physicians need training on the limitations and benefits of specific technologies.

Yes
user-165049

Doctors should be aware of the benefits

Yes
user-646901

especially the perception that smart watches are only "gadgets"

Yes
user-104260

need to monitor at doctor level the findings

Yes
user-346054

Receiving direct notification from patients

Yes
user-377267

Managemnet of the monitoring and responses to it is crucial

Yes
user-547683

Healthcare professionals (physicians and otherwise) should be alert to all available tools to proceed with a correct prompt diagnosis. I do think that most physicians in Cardiology are aware of such gadgets. The same may not be true in Neurology and Internal Medicine, yet physicians in these specialities do often treat patients with stroke in whom such tools may be of diagnostic interest.

Yes
user-698057

lack of information will hinder the wide use of such devices and the credible information should start from the relevant physicians

user-441980

But doing research, studying papers

Yes
user-672647

Knowledge on wearable smart heart monitoring devices is very essential to save lives.

Yes
user-604552

As this is not part of official protocols they need to be educated about the related bemefits for their patients.

Yes
user-508906

The main issue of Western world is too much food in combination with insufficient activity.
If a smart monitoring is helpfull can each person decide during training.

Yes
user-600998

Yes. A single (manual) observation of vitals combined with an ECG conducted in an controlled setting is one thing but watch wearing all day everyday will have practical issues causing data 'blips' that should not automatically cause concern.

Yes
user-40527

docs consider smart watch as part of diagnosis, suggest to wear, helps patients in upcoming life threatening risks, saves patient life.

Yes
user-664651

Don’t forget about other primary care providers nurse practitioner and pharmacists too

Yes
user-37526

Not very many Electrophysiologists know what to do with the data (how to get it, store it)

Yes
user-125195

Again for the reasons I noted earlier I believe that such devices offer great benefit to evaluate cardio fitness, to help develop exercise, dietary and other programs, and importantly if worn regularly they can establish baselines and be used to establish trends that should be of great benefit to physicians should they use them

Yes
user-164793

please also add nurse practitioners, and physician assistants

Yes
user-38414

Always necessary to update professionals .

Yes
user-320876

There is a need to educate and remind physicians how to best serve patients by "DO NO HARM"--current medical practices is financial and control-driven.

Yes
user-622747

our patients need a huge of education before discharge. it can replace the cardiac rehabilitation

Yes
user-622574

But, first the technologies should be improved by new algorithms.

Yes
user-200863

There need to have scientific studies with strict scrutiny and rigger to support their use and then train physicians to incorporate these technologies into their practice.

Yes
user-863919

Very few know both the medicine and the technology in sufficient depth to know how to deploy the tech.

Yes
user-737405

Yes, education and evidence of benefits

Yes
user-394368

AI is the future.

No
user-487852

Not necessarily, so people don't get panicked for non-threatening situations

Yes
user-907789

Practical knowledge of the indications for these devices are important for their prescription by the care provider

Yes
user-198903

We should start teaching MD and nursing student on how to deal with this kind of devices and how to deal with patients dealing with these devices

Please log in to comment.